Re: Neal Adams Science project

	Duration: 07:04 minutes Upload Time: 07-05-22 05:55:40 User: JaggedCrown :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: The is a video in response to Neal Adams expanding earth video. This video examines the theories flaws mathematically.
Comments
worldof1 ::: Favorites stop moving and fidgeting, it makes you look like your lying, atleast in my opionin. which also means mean that no1 can say im right or wrong, bcause its MY opinoin only, and not theres. 07-09-11 20:04:23 __________________________________________________
ikdow1 ::: Favorites Tectonics isn't you moron. Have you ever considered why tectonics exists? It's the most efficient way for the Earth to cool down and reach equilibrium temperature with space, coz let's face it. In a nutshell everything likes to achieve the same energy state and temperature, but hang on... Neal's theory goes against just about every scientific PROVEN method, or am I missing something here? 07-09-10 04:04:22 __________________________________________________
ikdow1 ::: Favorites Timefilm you're showing how little you know on this whole topic. The slab-pull force is the actual scientific term for it. Newtonian physics (something your have a bit of difficulty grasping). Gravity is the other term for it. Take something dense and place it on something that's plastically deformable and it'll sink. That's the slab-pull force. Neal's theory is a perpetual motion machine... 07-09-10 04:00:54 __________________________________________________
kassandrawoode6653 ::: Favorites Get paid for taking surveys at SURVEY4PROFIT dot NET 07-09-10 02:40:54 __________________________________________________
mattme020202 ::: Favorites Mass could be gained from within the core/asthenosphere, etc. NASA should be able to track it true, but this technology has not been out but a fraction of time in contrast to Geologic time. Not to discredit but, it is problematic when people postulate with such certainty due unknown variables. Keep up the diligent work!!! 07-09-08 17:03:05 __________________________________________________
mattme020202 ::: Favorites You are obviously highly intelligent, but most scholars used to think the Earth was flat. The problem with dividing by 65 million years...is possible exponential growth or shrinkage...expansion/contraction could be driven by changes in the heat of inner earth and/or the atmosphere and/or the sun. 07-09-08 17:02:17 __________________________________________________
timefilm ::: Favorites "Slab pull force" wow, just wow. Is this an official scientific term? Who's pulling it? Satan? It doesn't make any sense, ikdow... even if you have the surface rocks to prove it 07-09-06 23:00:17 __________________________________________________
timefilm ::: Favorites 'The whole reason why Neal's argument doesn't work is a/. There's no explanation as to where he gets his energy from (it'd effectively be a perpetual motion machine which is impossible' - The conveyerbelt crust, along with volcanoes using up stored presure and lava churning while the is no reduction in Earth size means YOU are claiming the earth is a perpetual motion machine - which is impossible :) 07-09-06 22:55:55 __________________________________________________
timefilm ::: Favorites 'These can't travel through a liquid (which is why we know we have a molten outer core' - maybe they can't travel through empty space 07-09-06 22:49:22 __________________________________________________
timefilm ::: Favorites "Numerous experiments have proven beyond any doubt that the Earth's core is iron" Get your head out your butt and direct me to these numerous experiments. Beyond any doubt?? Beyond ANY doubt??? 07-09-06 22:46:59 __________________________________________________